exact  any/all
  The original knowledge-management publication
denotes premium content | May 22 2013 

Feature

posted 1 Jul 1999 in Volume 2 Issue 10

Mind the gap

London commuters know very well the often repeated announcement to mind the gap while getting on and off the underground, but are managers minding virtual gaps in their businesses? According to Freddie McMahon & Kelvin Moore, a growing competency gap exists in companies which is accelerating investment failure. Here, they focus upon the investment risks relating to strategic and tactical initiatives in most organisations today. The objective of the assessment tool is primarily to challenge readers and increase awareness of this emerging issue. Awareness of a problem existing is half the battle towards solving it.

There can be no doubt that speed and complexity in business is increasing exponentially. The knock on effect is that people and organisations are struggling to keep pace. For most organisations, the competency gap is also widening exponentially and so are their investment risks as a direct consequence. By implication, the competency gap is widening so fast that traditional training and development is no longer a sustainable instrument in its own right. However, the situation is even worse than many may first suppose.

Business process re-engineering continues to drive down operational costs without due consideration to the loss and exposures caused by knowledge walking out of the organisation. It has further compounded the situation by creating a stress culture whereby the notion 'employability for life' replaces 'job for life'. This means an organisation's people are now typically assignment based with the pressure that a knowledge worker is now judged to be only as successful as their last one or two assignments. Part of the reward for success is yet another new assignment with new challenges that have little tolerance for learning curves. Business process re-engineering has decimated the notion of mentoring; thus removing one of the most effective ways of learning ever devised. The competency gap for the average knowledge worker is now 40 training days with the situation getting significantly worse year by year.

Internally within organisations today, people issues are said to be the number one reason why strategic and tactical investments fail to meet the original business objectives. People have replaced technology as the prime culprit. Yet people risks, quantified in terms of competency gap, are typically missing from investment decision making. CEOs, CFOs and CIOs are jeopardising their organisations by not managing their competency gap exposures in synchronisation with their investments for transformation. There is an emerging trend that stakeholders (who include, customers, partners, journalists, investment analysts, shareholders and regulators) will demand greater visibility and accountability in relation to the people risk exposure. They are likely to press for its inclusion as part of the standard reporting.

Only organisations that achieve market leadership in competency development will be able to manage their investment risks to the satisfaction of all stakeholders. The following diagram illustrates the growing strategic risks in relation to the market pace of change for organisations that are leaders in competency management and for those that are average.


The following self-assessment tool can be used to provide an initial indication of whether an organisation has a competency risk exposure and whether it is able to start managing the associated investment risks. The recommendation is that several colleagues collaboratively complete the assessment in order to create a balanced and realistic position. Choosing colleagues from different functions will add richness to the findings.

PDF Download of Self Assessment Tool

Do the results show that competency risks are being well managed or poorly managed? Do representatives from different functions assess your organisation's competency risk management abilities differently or similarly? Do strategy, finance and human resources speak with one voice or is there perhaps not even a conversation taking place? Does the CEO/CFO/CIO believe the investment competency risks are understood and being well managed?

If the results suggest you are a world leader in competency risk management then hold on to your position and capitalise on your good work and foresight. If you are a laggard then your business may simply not survive without fast and effective remedial action.

Organisations that fall between leaders and the laggards can draw little comfort. The market is becoming less tolerant of mediocrity; the consequences of investment failures are becoming just too big to ignore and will not be tolerated by stakeholders.

What is the competency gap?

Put simply, this is the gap between what the organisation's people can execute and what they must be able to execute to deliver strategic and tactical initiatives both now and in the future. People include everyone in the value creation process, and not just those directly employed by the company.

Competencies comprise skills, knowledge, experience and behaviours, and must be assessed and developed in the context of each organisation and its market.

Are investment competency risks measurable and manageable?

Yes they are but new techniques and business models must be involved. Industrial era approaches are no longer sufficient. Organisations need to understand and foster the intellectual capital imbedded in its people, structures and relationships. It is no longer a matter of more and better training.

Practical advice and solutions fall outside the scope of this paper and form the core work of its co-authors working in collaboration with other parties.

What are the next steps?

There is little doubt that organisations will need to manage their competency exposures in such a way to gain the confidence of external stakeholders such as customers, shareholders, partners, journalists, investment analysts and regulators. Simply saying our people and their training are important will soon not suffice. Outside forces will demand hard evidence to show that an organisations' human capital portfolio is increasing its value in line with market needs. External accreditation will not suffice in its own right unless it reflects benchmarks against market forces. Organisations that are unable to provide such evidence will attract greater scrutiny and exposure. Potentially, this could seriously damage their brand and position within the market place.

The meteoric rise in internet e-commerce and its associated complexity and speed is compounding investment risks growth. All organisations need to master the new associated competencies if they are to survive. Managing internet e-commerce investment requires an understanding of the breadth and depth of competency risk (see Futurelet 6 'A competency guide to internet e-commerce').

Footnotes
What is a © Futurelet?
Time is now becoming more scarce than money in knowledge based businesses. With this in mind, a ( Futurelet provides a brief strategic insight into a emerging problem with a guidance statement on the way©©© forward. It is designed to provoke a line of thinking which stays with the reader regardless of whether they agree or not with the analysis.


Other iqport foundation Futurelets available as knowledge assets on the iqport trading exchange www.iqport.com are listed below.

©Futurelet 1
Do you as an organisation blame your people for failure to deliver?


Why will this excuse be soon no longer tolerated?

©Futurelet 2
Is there an emerging new market for the trading of intellectual capital?


Why is the timing right to start trading intellectual capital futures?

©Futurelet 3
Can intellectual capital Investors help funding new business research?


Why is the timing right to fund business research differently?

©Futurelet 4
Integrating knowledge management into customer loyalty.


©Futurelet 5
A vision of a knowledge exchange.


©Futurelet 6
A competency guide to internet e-commerce


Freddie McMahon is the inventor of the global trading exchange business model and is a Director and Chief Strategy Officer of iqport. Freddie is a thought leader in intellectual capital and internet e-commerce, and his work is driven by a pragmatism and desire to assist individuals and organisations prosper in the knowledge era. He can be contacted at:freddie.mcmahon@iqportfoundation.com

Kelvin Moore is a founder member of iqport and a Director of the operating company. He was one of the first people to create a consortium MBA and mentoring programme for high potential leaders representing blue chip companies from financial services, accounting and consultancy, oil, telecommunications and from government. He can be contacted at:
kelvin.moore@iqportfoundation.com
www.iqportfoundation.com
www.iqport.com


Follow us on:


Copyright ©2013 Wilmington Publishing & Information Ltd 2010, a division of the Wilmington Group PLC. Wilmington Publishing & Information Ltd is a company registered in England & Wales with company number 03368442 GB. Registered office: 19 - 21 Christopher Street, London EC2A 2BS. VAT NO.GB 899 3725 51